Lutsenko’s complaint and rush to the Holodnitsky qualification and disciplinary Commission can consider three months

The complaint filed to the head of the Specialized anti-corruption Prosecutor’s office (SAP) Nazar holodnitsky in the qualification and disciplinary Commission of prosecutors (MPC) may consider up to three months.

This «Ukrainian truth» said the head of the Department of preparation of materials for disciplinary responsibility and dismissal of prosecutors from the post Alexey kotelevsky.

«Complaints received at the MPC, they come to us in the Secretariat, we have them recorded in the automated system, and using automated distribution complaint gets to a specific member of the Commission. He alone makes the decision to open such proceedings or to refuse», – he told.

According to Kotelevsky, a member of the Commission may extend no more than a month, if you do not have time to produce it.

The final decision on the complaint is taken collectively.

The head of the National anticorruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) Artem Sytnik declared that wiretapping in the Cabinet of Holodnitsky recorded as he leaked information about impending searches and put pressure on officials.

First, the tapping of NABOO in the office of Golodnitsky reported «Ukrainian Pravda» on 21 March. Then the head of SAP said that it was a provocation, and assured that no one can force him to resign. In turn, Sytnik, commenting on the situation, said that «journalists write something that, frankly, a fantasy novel just resting».

On March 24, the Prosecutor General of Ukraine Yuriy Lutsenko informed that the audition of the head of the SAP was authorized by the court.

March 28 the source of the «Ukrainian news» in GPU reported that the Holodnitsky can be arrested. Press Secretary of the Prosecutor General Larisa Sargan called it «rumors, which makes no sense to comment on.»

March 29 Sytnik confirmed that the NAB is conducting an investigation in respect of Golodnitsky, noting that his Department cooperates with the General Prosecutor’s office.

The GPU on 30 March reported that the Holodnitsky was to select a sample voice, but he did not come to the GPU.

Lutsenko 30 Mar asked qualification and disciplinary Commission of prosecutors to consider the question of dismissal of Holodnitsky. Head of SAP said that «not clings».

Holodnitsky headed a new unit GPU is a Specialized anti-corruption Prosecutor’s office – December 1, 2015.




Lutsenko’s complaint and rush to the Holodnitsky qualification and disciplinary Commission can consider three months 30.03.2018

0
Март 30th, 2018 by
36 queries