Ukrainian parliamentarians and political elites didn’t want in the Verkhovna Rada considered the performance of the GPU on the removal of immunity of several MPs, said in comments to the edition «GORDON» the former head of the Department of criminal intelligence service GUBOP Ministry of internal Affairs of Ukraine Valery Chickens.
«I think the process has begun. Although, by and large, the change of the political formation has not occurred, there have been changes to the teams themselves. Due to the fact that we were covering wave of the European movement, we are unwittingly drawn into this whirlpool. And that’s good. This process will force the Armenian authorities to make concrete steps. I very much doubt that the MPs or the political elites wanted the removal of immunity from their colleagues. I think an important role here played the position of journalists and NGOs», – said the Chickens.
He focused on the fact that NABOO was pretty difficult to organize the operation, which was detained in the guard faction people’s Deputy Borislav Rosenblatt.
«To conduct such an operation, as with Rosenblatt, is very difficult. It could be a leak, and betrayal. In General, the situation is such that operatives for the arrest of this or that official need to ask permission, saying, dear thief, can I go to the Prosecutor, the judge, to be able to follow you? And NAB is not able to take in the development of high-level officials. Moreover, their work is hampered by the immunity of deputies. Yes, politicians need to be protected, but in our conditions is to resort to least: no protection deputies. Indeed, more than half of them are keepers of the old traditions that we have had in very large cases,» – said the source.
According to him, the suspects of crimes officials will make every attempt to avoid responsibility.
«The abolition of parliamentary immunity will greatly facilitate the work of institutions, such as NABOO. There must be not only investigative structure – they also need your attorney and your judge. Otherwise there will be no change. If people give hope for more arrests of officials and the removal of immunity, of course, that’s a plus. It is obvious that we are faced with resistance: for example, suspected of committing crimes of officials will be hiding abroad, think that they have the benefit of the state and so on,» said the Chickens.
According to him, militiamen should not have to demonstrate at meetings of the procedural Committee of the Verkhovna Rada of video recordings of their operations.
«We are now in the shadow of spinning $20-40 billion do You think the corrupt will not find it possible to pay the Deposit in court? Of course, now all these detentions and reporting to the removal of immunity are somewhat theatrical. But still the situation is gradually changing. Need to get the power to change the law and how to manage them. What I see are the cons? Spy, working undercover, must have serious protection. This, in particular, for the agent to NAB Catherine. But now, unfortunately, we have to show the play and tell all the details of the transaction. This is very bad. Members of the procedural Committee of the Verkhovna Rada it was impossible to show employees NABOO. On the other hand, people at least see that it interests someone is struggling», – concluded the source.
July 11, the Verkhovna Rada at its evening meeting considered the submission of the Prosecutor General for consent to criminal prosecution of five deputies.
Parliament rejected the submission on Eugene Deydey (people’s front) and Andrey Lozovoy (Radical party).
With Oles Dovgy («will of the people»), Maksym Polyakov (people’s front) and independent Borislav Rosenblatt immunity lifted.
The deputies did not give consent to detention and arrest Polyakov and Rosenblatt.
Today at 17.00 the Verkhovna Rada should start its consideration of the submission of the Prosecutor General to withdraw the immunity of MP from the Opposition bloc Mikhail Dobkin.
Co-founder of OCD Chickens: we are now in the shadow of spinning $20 — 40 billion do You think the corrupt will not find it possible to pay the Deposit in court? 13.07.2017